Alert button

Are State-of-the-art Visual Place Recognition Techniques any Good for Aerial Robotics?

Add code
Bookmark button
Alert button
Apr 16, 2019
Mubariz Zaffar, Ahmad Khaliq, Shoaib Ehsan, Michael Milford, Kostas Alexis, Klaus McDonald-Maier

Figure 1 for Are State-of-the-art Visual Place Recognition Techniques any Good for Aerial Robotics?
Figure 2 for Are State-of-the-art Visual Place Recognition Techniques any Good for Aerial Robotics?
Figure 3 for Are State-of-the-art Visual Place Recognition Techniques any Good for Aerial Robotics?
Figure 4 for Are State-of-the-art Visual Place Recognition Techniques any Good for Aerial Robotics?

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

Twitter IconFacebook IconLinkedin IconWhatsapp IconMessenger Icon

Visual Place Recognition (VPR) has seen significant advances at the frontiers of matching performance and computational superiority over the past few years. However, these evaluations are performed for ground-based mobile platforms and cannot be generalized to aerial platforms. The degree of viewpoint variation experienced by aerial robots is complex, with their processing power and on-board memory limited by payload size and battery ratings. Therefore, in this paper, we collect $8$ state-of-the-art VPR techniques that have been previously evaluated for ground-based platforms and compare them on $2$ recently proposed aerial place recognition datasets with three prime focuses: a) Matching performance b) Processing power consumption c) Projected memory requirements. This gives a birds-eye view of the applicability of contemporary VPR research to aerial robotics and lays down the the nature of challenges for aerial-VPR.

* 8 pages, 7 figures  
View paper onarxiv icon

Share this with someone who'll enjoy it:

Twitter IconFacebook IconLinkedin IconWhatsapp IconMessenger Icon