Add to Chrome
Add to Firefox
Add to EdgeHuichi Zhou
MPAT: Building Robust Deep Neural Networks against Textual Adversarial Attacks
Feb 29, 2024
Deep neural networks have been proven to be vulnerable to adversarial examples and various methods have been proposed to defend against adversarial attacks for natural language processing tasks. However, previous defense methods have limitations in maintaining effective defense while ensuring the performance of the original task. In this paper, we propose a malicious perturbation based adversarial training method (MPAT) for building robust deep neural networks against textual adversarial attacks. Specifically, we construct a multi-level malicious example generation strategy to generate adversarial examples with malicious perturbations, which are used instead of original inputs for model training. Additionally, we employ a novel training objective function to ensure achieving the defense goal without compromising the performance on the original task. We conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate our defense method by attacking five victim models on three benchmark datasets. The result demonstrates that our method is more effective against malicious adversarial attacks compared with previous defense methods while maintaining or further improving the performance on the original task.
MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmark
Feb 07, 2024Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have gained significant attention recently, showing remarkable potential in artificial general intelligence. However, assessing the utility of MLLMs presents considerable challenges, primarily due to the absence multimodal benchmarks that align with human preferences. Inspired by LLM-as-a-Judge in LLMs, this paper introduces a novel benchmark, termed MLLM-as-a-Judge, to assess the ability of MLLMs in assisting judges including three distinct tasks: Scoring Evaluation, Pair Comparison, and Batch Ranking. Our study reveals that, while MLLMs demonstrate remarkable human-like discernment in Pair Comparisons, there is a significant divergence from human preferences in Scoring Evaluation and Batch Ranking tasks. Furthermore, MLLMs still face challenges in judgment, including diverse biases, hallucinatory responses, and inconsistencies, even for advanced models such as GPT-4V. These findings emphasize the pressing need for enhancements and further research efforts regarding MLLMs as fully reliable evaluators. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/Dongping-Chen/MLLM-as-a-Judge.