Add to Chrome
Add to Firefox
Add to EdgeTianming Li
GSINA: Improving Subgraph Extraction for Graph Invariant Learning via Graph Sinkhorn Attention
Feb 11, 2024
Graph invariant learning (GIL) has been an effective approach to discovering the invariant relationships between graph data and its labels for different graph learning tasks under various distribution shifts. Many recent endeavors of GIL focus on extracting the invariant subgraph from the input graph for prediction as a regularization strategy to improve the generalization performance of graph learning. Despite their success, such methods also have various limitations in obtaining their invariant subgraphs. In this paper, we provide in-depth analyses of the drawbacks of existing works and propose corresponding principles of our invariant subgraph extraction: 1) the sparsity, to filter out the variant features, 2) the softness, for a broader solution space, and 3) the differentiability, for a soundly end-to-end optimization. To meet these principles in one shot, we leverage the Optimal Transport (OT) theory and propose a novel graph attention mechanism called Graph Sinkhorn Attention (GSINA). This novel approach serves as a powerful regularization method for GIL tasks. By GSINA, we are able to obtain meaningful, differentiable invariant subgraphs with controllable sparsity and softness. Moreover, GSINA is a general graph learning framework that could handle GIL tasks of multiple data grain levels. Extensive experiments on both synthetic and real-world datasets validate the superiority of our GSINA, which outperforms the state-of-the-art GIL methods by large margins on both graph-level tasks and node-level tasks. Our code is publicly available at \url{https://github.com/dingfangyu/GSINA}.
Matching Exemplar as Next Sentence Prediction (MeNSP): Zero-shot Prompt Learning for Automatic Scoring in Science Education
Jan 20, 2023
Developing models to automatically score students' written responses to science problems is critical for science education. However, collecting and labeling sufficient student responses for training models is time and cost-consuming. Recent studies suggest that pre-trained language models (PLMs) can be adapted to downstream tasks without fine-tuning with prompts. However, no research has employed such a prompt approach in science education. As student responses are presented with natural language, aligning the scoring procedure as the next sentence prediction task using prompts can skip the costly fine-tuning stage. In this study, we developed a zero-shot approach to automatically score student responses via Matching Exemplars as Next Sentence Prediction (MeNSP). This approach employs no training samples. We first apply MeNSP in scoring three assessment tasks of scientific argumentation and found machine-human scoring agreements, Cohen's Kappa ranges from 0.30 to 0.57, and F1 score ranges from 0.54 to 0.81. To improve the performance, we extend our research to the few-shots setting, either randomly selecting labeled student responses or manually constructing responses to fine-tune the models. We find that one task's performance is improved with more samples, Cohen's Kappa from 0.30 to 0.38, and F1 score from 0.54 to 0.59; for the two others, scoring performance is not improved. We also find that randomly selected few-shots perform better than the human expert-crafted approach. This study suggests that MeNSP can yield referable automatic scoring for student responses while significantly reducing the cost of model training. This method can benefit low-stakes classroom assessment practices in science education. Future research should further explore the applicability of the MeNSP in different types of assessment tasks in science education and improve the model performance.