Robust MDPs are a promising framework for computing robust policies in reinforcement learning. Ambiguity sets, which represent the plausible errors in transition probabilities, determine the trade-off between robustness and average-case performance. The standard practice of defining ambiguity sets using the $L_1$ norm leads, unfortunately, to loose and impractical guarantees. This paper describes new methods for optimizing the shape of ambiguity sets beyond the $L_1$ norm. We derive new high-confidence sampling bounds for weighted $L_1$ and weighted $L_\infty$ ambiguity sets and describe how to compute near-optimal weights from rough value function estimates. Experimental results on a diverse set of benchmarks show that optimized ambiguity sets provide significantly tighter robustness guarantees.

High-Confidence Policy Optimization: Reshaping Ambiguity Sets in Robust MDPs