Add to Chrome
Add to Firefox
Add to EdgeMargaret Livingstone
Performance-optimized deep neural networks are evolving into worse models of inferotemporal visual cortex
Jun 06, 2023
One of the most impactful findings in computational neuroscience over the past decade is that the object recognition accuracy of deep neural networks (DNNs) correlates with their ability to predict neural responses to natural images in the inferotemporal (IT) cortex. This discovery supported the long-held theory that object recognition is a core objective of the visual cortex, and suggested that more accurate DNNs would serve as better models of IT neuron responses to images. Since then, deep learning has undergone a revolution of scale: billion parameter-scale DNNs trained on billions of images are rivaling or outperforming humans at visual tasks including object recognition. Have today's DNNs become more accurate at predicting IT neuron responses to images as they have grown more accurate at object recognition? Surprisingly, across three independent experiments, we find this is not the case. DNNs have become progressively worse models of IT as their accuracy has increased on ImageNet. To understand why DNNs experience this trade-off and evaluate if they are still an appropriate paradigm for modeling the visual system, we turn to recordings of IT that capture spatially resolved maps of neuronal activity elicited by natural images. These neuronal activity maps reveal that DNNs trained on ImageNet learn to rely on different visual features than those encoded by IT and that this problem worsens as their accuracy increases. We successfully resolved this issue with the neural harmonizer, a plug-and-play training routine for DNNs that aligns their learned representations with humans. Our results suggest that harmonized DNNs break the trade-off between ImageNet accuracy and neural prediction accuracy that assails current DNNs and offer a path to more accurate models of biological vision.
Look Twice: A Computational Model of Return Fixations across Tasks and Species
Jan 05, 2021
Saccadic eye movements allow animals to bring different parts of an image into high-resolution. During free viewing, inhibition of return incentivizes exploration by discouraging previously visited locations. Despite this inhibition, here we show that subjects make frequent return fixations. We systematically studied a total of 44,328 return fixations out of 217,440 fixations across different tasks, in monkeys and humans, and in static images or egocentric videos. The ubiquitous return fixations were consistent across subjects, tended to occur within short offsets, and were characterized by longer duration than non-return fixations. The locations of return fixations corresponded to image areas of higher saliency and higher similarity to the sought target during visual search tasks. We propose a biologically-inspired computational model that capitalizes on a deep convolutional neural network for object recognition to predict a sequence of fixations. Given an input image, the model computes four maps that constrain the location of the next saccade: a saliency map, a target similarity map, a saccade size map, and a memory map. The model exhibits frequent return fixations and approximates the properties of return fixations across tasks and species. The model provides initial steps towards capturing the trade-off between exploitation of informative image locations combined with exploration of novel image locations during scene viewing.