A large number of federated learning (FL) algorithms have been proposed for different applications and from varying perspectives. However, the evaluation of such approaches often relies on a single metric (e.g., accuracy). Such a practice fails to account for the unique demands and diverse requirements of different use cases. Thus, how to comprehensively evaluate an FL algorithm and determine the most suitable candidate for a designated use case remains an open question. To mitigate this research gap, we introduce the Holistic Evaluation Metrics (HEM) for FL in this work. Specifically, we collectively focus on three primary use cases, which are Internet of Things (IoT), smart devices, and institutions. The evaluation metric encompasses various aspects including accuracy, convergence, computational efficiency, fairness, and personalization. We then assign a respective importance vector for each use case, reflecting their distinct performance requirements and priorities. The HEM index is finally generated by integrating these metric components with their respective importance vectors. Through evaluating different FL algorithms in these three prevalent use cases, our experimental results demonstrate that HEM can effectively assess and identify the FL algorithms best suited to particular scenarios. We anticipate this work sheds light on the evaluation process for pragmatic FL algorithms in real-world applications.
The robustness of deep learning models against adversarial attacks remains a pivotal concern. This study presents, for the first time, an exhaustive review of the transferability aspect of adversarial attacks. It systematically categorizes and critically evaluates various methodologies developed to augment the transferability of adversarial attacks. This study encompasses a spectrum of techniques, including Generative Structure, Semantic Similarity, Gradient Editing, Target Modification, and Ensemble Approach. Concurrently, this paper introduces a benchmark framework \textit{TAA-Bench}, integrating ten leading methodologies for adversarial attack transferability, thereby providing a standardized and systematic platform for comparative analysis across diverse model architectures. Through comprehensive scrutiny, we delineate the efficacy and constraints of each method, shedding light on their underlying operational principles and practical utility. This review endeavors to be a quintessential resource for both scholars and practitioners in the field, charting the complex terrain of adversarial transferability and setting a foundation for future explorations in this vital sector. The associated codebase is accessible at: https://github.com/KxPlaug/TAA-Bench
In the modern era where software plays a pivotal role, software security and vulnerability analysis have become essential for software development. Fuzzing test, as an efficient software testing method, are widely used in various domains. Moreover, the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs) has facilitated their application in the field of software testing, demonstrating remarkable performance. Considering that existing fuzzing test techniques are not entirely automated and software vulnerabilities continue to evolve, there is a growing trend towards employing fuzzing test generated based on large language models. This survey provides a systematic overview of the approaches that fuse LLMs and fuzzing tests for software testing. In this paper, a statistical analysis and discussion of the literature in three areas, namely LLMs, fuzzing test, and fuzzing test generated based on LLMs, are conducted by summarising the state-of-the-art methods up until 2024. Our survey also investigates the potential for widespread deployment and application of fuzzing test techniques generated by LLMs in the future.
Artificially generated induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) from somatic cells play an important role for disease modeling and drug screening of neurodegenerative diseases. Astrocytes differentiated from iPSCs are important targets to investigate neuronal metabolism. The astrocyte differentiation progress can be monitored through the variations of morphology observed from microscopy images at different differentiation stages, then determined by molecular biology techniques upon maturation. However, the astrocytes usually ``perfectly'' blend into the background and some of them are covered by interference information (i.e., dead cells, media sediments, and cell debris), which makes astrocytes difficult to observe. Due to the lack of annotated datasets, the existing state-of-the-art deep learning approaches cannot be used to address this issue. In this paper, we introduce a new task named astrocyte segmentation with a novel dataset, called IAI704, which contains 704 images and their corresponding pixel-level annotation masks. Moreover, a novel frequency domain denoising network, named FDNet, is proposed for astrocyte segmentation. In detail, our FDNet consists of a contextual information fusion module (CIF), an attention block (AB), and a Fourier transform block (FTB). CIF and AB fuse multi-scale feature embeddings to localize the astrocytes. FTB transforms feature embeddings into the frequency domain and conducts a high-pass filter to eliminate interference information. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed FDNet over the state-of-the-art substitutes in astrocyte segmentation, shedding insights for iPSC differentiation progress prediction.
Adversarial generative models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), are widely applied for generating various types of data, i.e., images, text, and audio. Accordingly, its promising performance has led to the GAN-based adversarial attack methods in the white-box and black-box attack scenarios. The importance of transferable black-box attacks lies in their ability to be effective across different models and settings, more closely aligning with real-world applications. However, it remains challenging to retain the performance in terms of transferable adversarial examples for such methods. Meanwhile, we observe that some enhanced gradient-based transferable adversarial attack algorithms require prolonged time for adversarial sample generation. Thus, in this work, we propose a novel algorithm named GE-AdvGAN to enhance the transferability of adversarial samples whilst improving the algorithm's efficiency. The main approach is via optimising the training process of the generator parameters. With the functional and characteristic similarity analysis, we introduce a novel gradient editing (GE) mechanism and verify its feasibility in generating transferable samples on various models. Moreover, by exploring the frequency domain information to determine the gradient editing direction, GE-AdvGAN can generate highly transferable adversarial samples while minimizing the execution time in comparison to the state-of-the-art transferable adversarial attack algorithms. The performance of GE-AdvGAN is comprehensively evaluated by large-scale experiments on different datasets, which results demonstrate the superiority of our algorithm. The code for our algorithm is available at: https://github.com/LMBTough/GE-advGAN
As artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly becomes an integral part of our societal and individual activities, there is a growing imperative to develop responsible AI solutions. Despite a diverse assortment of machine learning fairness solutions is proposed in the literature, there is reportedly a lack of practical implementation of these tools in real-world applications. Industry experts have participated in thorough discussions on the challenges associated with operationalising fairness in the development of machine learning-empowered solutions, in which a shift toward human-centred approaches is promptly advocated to mitigate the limitations of existing techniques. In this work, we propose a human-in-the-loop approach for fairness auditing, presenting a mixed visual analytical system (hereafter referred to as 'FairCompass'), which integrates both subgroup discovery technique and the decision tree-based schema for end users. Moreover, we innovatively integrate an Exploration, Guidance and Informed Analysis loop, to facilitate the use of the Knowledge Generation Model for Visual Analytics in FairCompass. We evaluate the effectiveness of FairCompass for fairness auditing in a real-world scenario, and the findings demonstrate the system's potential for real-world deployability. We anticipate this work will address the current gaps in research for fairness and facilitate the operationalisation of fairness in machine learning systems.
To better understand the output of deep neural networks (DNN), attribution based methods have been an important approach for model interpretability, which assign a score for each input dimension to indicate its importance towards the model outcome. Notably, the attribution methods use the axioms of sensitivity and implementation invariance to ensure the validity and reliability of attribution results. Yet, the existing attribution methods present challenges for effective interpretation and efficient computation. In this work, we introduce MFABA, an attribution algorithm that adheres to axioms, as a novel method for interpreting DNN. Additionally, we provide the theoretical proof and in-depth analysis for MFABA algorithm, and conduct a large scale experiment. The results demonstrate its superiority by achieving over 101.5142 times faster speed than the state-of-the-art attribution algorithms. The effectiveness of MFABA is thoroughly evaluated through the statistical analysis in comparison to other methods, and the full implementation package is open-source at: https://github.com/LMBTough/MFABA
As open-source AI software projects become an integral component in the AI software development, it is critical to develop a novel methods to ensure and measure the security of the open-source projects for developers. Code ownership, pivotal in the evolution of such projects, offers insights into developer engagement and potential vulnerabilities. In this paper, we leverage the code ownership metrics to empirically investigate the correlation with the latent vulnerabilities across five prominent open-source AI software projects. The findings from the large-scale empirical study suggest a positive relationship between high-level ownership (characterised by a limited number of minor contributors) and a decrease in vulnerabilities. Furthermore, we innovatively introduce the time metrics, anchored on the project's duration, individual source code file timelines, and the count of impacted releases. These metrics adeptly categorise distinct phases of open-source AI software projects and their respective vulnerability intensities. With these novel code ownership metrics, we have implemented a Python-based command-line application to aid project curators and quality assurance professionals in evaluating and benchmarking their on-site projects. We anticipate this work will embark a continuous research development for securing and measuring open-source AI project security.
While deep neural networks have excellent results in many fields, they are susceptible to interference from attacking samples resulting in erroneous judgments. Feature-level attacks are one of the effective attack types, which targets the learnt features in the hidden layers to improve its transferability across different models. Yet it is observed that the transferability has been largely impacted by the neuron importance estimation results. In this paper, a double adversarial neuron attribution attack method, termed `DANAA', is proposed to obtain more accurate feature importance estimation. In our method, the model outputs are attributed to the middle layer based on an adversarial non-linear path. The goal is to measure the weight of individual neurons and retain the features that are more important towards transferability. We have conducted extensive experiments on the benchmark datasets to demonstrate the state-of-the-art performance of our method. Our code is available at: https://github.com/Davidjinzb/DANAA
The recent performance leap of Large Language Models (LLMs) opens up new opportunities across numerous industrial applications and domains. However, erroneous generations, such as false predictions, misinformation, and hallucination made by LLMs, have also raised severe concerns for the trustworthiness of LLMs', especially in safety-, security- and reliability-sensitive scenarios, potentially hindering real-world adoptions. While uncertainty estimation has shown its potential for interpreting the prediction risks made by general machine learning (ML) models, little is known about whether and to what extent it can help explore an LLM's capabilities and counteract its undesired behavior. To bridge the gap, in this paper, we initiate an exploratory study on the risk assessment of LLMs from the lens of uncertainty. In particular, we experiment with twelve uncertainty estimation methods and four LLMs on four prominent natural language processing (NLP) tasks to investigate to what extent uncertainty estimation techniques could help characterize the prediction risks of LLMs. Our findings validate the effectiveness of uncertainty estimation for revealing LLMs' uncertain/non-factual predictions. In addition to general NLP tasks, we extensively conduct experiments with four LLMs for code generation on two datasets. We find that uncertainty estimation can potentially uncover buggy programs generated by LLMs. Insights from our study shed light on future design and development for reliable LLMs, facilitating further research toward enhancing the trustworthiness of LLMs.